GEMs and GEM-TPC Activities from CNS-Tokyo

Presentation on theme: "GEMs and GEM-TPC Activities from CNS-Tokyo"— Presentation transcript:

1 GEMs and GEM-TPC Activities from CNS-Tokyo
Taku Gunji Hideki Hamagaki Yorito Yamaguchi Center for Nuclear Study The University of Tokyo

2 Outline Introduction Development of GEM in Japan
Study of the characteristics of GEM Prototype GEM-TPC R&D Next Step for the GEM-TPC Upgrade

3 Introduction R&D of GEM detectors has begun in 2002.
The primary motivation was for the PHENIX upgrade of inner detectors. Hybrid of HBD + TPC Drift regions HV plane (~ -30kV) Grid Readout Plane (GEM,mMega or PC) Readout Pads r ~ 1 cm f ~ 2 mm CsI layer Readout plane Hybrid of HBD + TPC Discussion started in 2001. HBD: CsI+GEM (Cherenkov) Use CF4 Gas eID and Dalitz rejection to improve S/N in Lmee. Finally, only HBD was installed in 2007.

4 Introduction Three directions in R&D of GEMs at CNS.
1: Making GEMs in Japan and its development Fabrication process Thick GEM, Resistive GEM 2: Application of GEM GEM-TPC HBD, Imaging detectors (X-rays, neutrons) 3: Characteristics and performance evaluation Gas gain Gain variation vs. time and P/T Ion Feedback Thick GEM (100um, 150um) Resistive GEM (Resistive-Kapton) and Glass-GEM

5 Having started using CERN-GEM
First measurement using CERN-GEMs in 2002. Drift Plane GEM 2 GEM 1 2mm 3mm 1MΩ HV 1 (-1.5~-2.2kV) HV 2 (-1.4~-1.6kV) Spectrum for Fe55 with triple GEMs P10 VGEM=335V Ed=2kV/cm ArCO2 VGEM=380V CF4 VGEM=535V Ed=0.3kV/cm

6 Having started using CERN-GEM
Gas Gain of CERN-GEM ● 3-GEM, P ▲ 2-GEM, P10 ● 3-GEM, ArCO ▲ 2-GEM, ArCO2 ● 3-GEM, CF4 S.Bachmann et al. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A438(1999)376 Weizmann Institute of Science; December, 2002

7 GEMs made in Japan Many development of Making GEMs in Japan
CERN-GEM: Chemical etching CNS-RIEKN-SciEnergy: Dry (Plasma+Laser) etching NIM A525, 529, 2004 Cylindrical shape  thicker GEM ( um) CERN-GEM CNS-GEM Etching method chemical plasma plasma+laser Cross-section of GEM hole bi-conical shape cylindrical shape

8 Gain of CNS-GEM Comparable gain to CERN-GEM

9 Gain Stability Gain of CNS-GEM is stabilized in shorter time.
Difference may be due to the difference in hole shape? Less probability for charge-up due to cylindrical shape. Other reasons like surface conditions. P/T corrected P/T corrected

10 Gain vs. P/T Electron multiplication in gas depends on P/T
a function of E/p, or more precisely E/n ~ ER(T/p) M ~ Aexp[aE/n] = Aexp[(aE/n0)(1 – dn)]; n = n0 + dn Similar between CERN-GEM and CNS-GEM.

11 Measuring Ion Feedback
Xrays (~17keV) Ion feedback factor: F =Ic/Ia chamber ArCH4　 50mm Mesh Current Shield What to measure: pad current: Ia mesh current: Ic Parameters VGEM：voltage applied to each GEM (V) Ed：electric field in the drift region (kV/cm) Et：electric field in the transfer region (kV/cm) Ei: electric field in induction region (kV/cm) number of GEMs：1,2 or 3 Ic 3mm HV1 A Mesh(cathode) drift region 3mm HV2 Ed GEM3 2mm GEM2 R 2mm GEM1 2mm Pad(anode) A Pad Current HV1<HV2 Ia Typical values: HV1=-2200V, HV2=-2100V,VGEM =350V

12 Dependence of F on VGEM Ed =0.33(kV/cm)
次に、今の2つの電流値の比をとった、イオンフィードバックFのVGEM依存性の結果を示します。 ・GEMの枚数が1枚のときも 　2枚のときも、3枚のときも、 　VGEMを上げるとイオンフィードバックFが下がる傾向がありました。 また、 ・GEM3枚のときはGEM2枚や1枚のときと比べてイオンフィードバックFの値が大きく、 ・3枚のときの曲線はVGEMを上げていくとGEM2枚、1枚のときの曲線へ近づく という結果を得ました。 F decreases with increase of VGEM F for triple-GEM is large compared to single- and double-GEM At large VGEM, F value for triple-GEM approaches those of single- and double-GEM

13 Dependence of F on Ed, Et/Ei
F increases with increase of Ed Ion feedback is less than 5% with small Ed This is one way for the ion feedback suppression. What is the requirement of ion feedback? Evaluation is needed for performance at low Ed F decreases as Et/Ei increases. F seems to be less sensitive to Ei, Et compared to Ed. VGEM =320(V) Ed =0.5 kV/cm 次に、イオンフィードバックFのドリフト電場Ed依存性の結果を示します。 ・GEMの枚数が1枚のときも 　2枚のときも3枚のときも、ドリフト電場Edを上げるとイオンフィードバックFが大きくなる傾向がありました。 また、 ・Edを十分小さくすることで、イオンフィードバックFを5%以下に抑えることができました。 このような ・小さいドリフト電場でも、検出器ごとに要求される分解能や検出効率を達成できるかどうかは検討中です。 Ed =0.33kV/cm ●　Et /Ei = 0.5 ▲　Et /Ei = 1 ■　Et /Ei = 2

14 Thick GEM Thicker GEM has a potential to achieve higher gain with smaller voltage. VGEM=250V/50um Electric field along the center of a GEM hole calculated by Maxwell-3D. 150um-GEM VGEM=750V 100um-GEM VGEM=500V Standard-GEM (50um) VGEM=250V Higher Electric field is realized for thickness>100um.

15 Gas Gain of Thick GEM Insulator: LCP (Liquid Cristal Polymer)
Can be pierced easily than Kapton by dry etching. Less water absorption property 150mm-GEM 100mm-GEM (Gain3/2) 3 layers of standard-GEM Ar(80%)/CO2(20%) Large gain for thicker GEM At the same VGEM(=300V/50um), Gain(100/50)=450 and Gain(150/50)=1600. For 150um GEM, sparks happened at low voltage investigation is under way LCP? Overhung? limit for charge density?

16 Gas Gain vs. P/T for Thick GEM
Ar(80%)/CO2(20%) Sensitivity of Gain w.r.t P/T depends on thickness of GEM Thicker GEM is less sensitive to P/T.

17 Development of Resistive-GEM
To protect GEMs from spark Resistive Materials to the electrodes. Being developed with RIKEN Cosmic-Ray Group Binding sheet : polyimide‐based adhesive material Resistive-Kapton: 2Mohm/cm Ar(70%)/CO2(30%) N->W W->N

18 More recent developments
Large GEM Many issues so far for the large GEMs (ex)30x30cm2 Gain uniformity (uniform tension) Large probability for discharge to happen Fragile for the spark due to large capacitance Improvement for the stable operation by SciEnergy Co Ltd. in Japan Glass GEM Kapton and LCP will not be suitable for the long operation under sealed due to radiation damage and out gas. New development of GEM made by glass started. More hardness, no out gas

19 R&D of GEM-TPC Building TPC Prototype in 2003
Endcap readout can be replaced with GEM or MWPC End cap 10cm Preamp+ diff. driver (AD8058, AD8132) ct=1us Field cage 36x17x17cm3 115 Au strips 1MW bwt. strips Gas vessel 60x29x29cm3

20 GEM or MWPC readout MWPC readout GEM readout Two types of readout pads
2.5x2,5, 6.0x6.0, 9.5x9.5, 13x13mm2 Two types of readout pads 2.5x2.5, 6x6, 9.5x9.5, 13.5x13.5mm2 Rectangular & chevrontype with 1.09 mm x 12mm

21 Characteristic of CF4 Studied with GEM and MWPC Readout Gas Gain
Use CERN-GEM GEM MWPC

22 Characteristic of CF4 Studied with GEM and MWPC Readout
Energy resolution Resolution with GEM is x1.5 larger than √Nseed ~ 9% Smaller than that of MWPC (s=37%) Large attachment (e-+CF4->F-+CF3) in the larger field realized by the wire potential? GEM MWPC s=13% Gain at 3x104 Gain at 4x103 s=37%

23 Characteristic of CF4 Studied with MWPC Readout (Pure CF4)
10cm/μsec @900V/cm/atm Studied with MWPC Readout (Pure CF4) Drift velocity Longitudinal diffusion Pure CF4 N2 Laser (λ=337nm) 60μm

24 Beamtest in 2004 GEM-TPC beamtest at KEK in 2004 (CERN-GEM)
Three gases (no magnetic field) Ar(90%)-CH4(10%)(P10), Ar(70%)-C2H6(30%), CF4 Tested items Detection Efficiency Position Resolution Beam rate dependence dE/dx TPC TPC

25 Typical signal of GEM-TPC
With 100 MHz FADC Gas = Ar-C2H6 Drift length = 85mm Rectangular pad Beam = 1 GeV/c electron from KEK-PS in May 2004 Signals spread over 4 pads (~4.4mm) [PRF in backup slides] Time (6.4ms=640bin, 1bin=10ns, 100MHz FADC) Track

26 Detection Efficiency Definition: Nhit(1&2&3)/Nhit(1&3) Ar-CH4 99.3%
1st 2nd 3rd Efficiency > 99% for enough gain Ar-CH4 99.3% Ar-C2H6 99.6% CF4 99.8%

27 Position Resolution X (transverse) and Z (drift direction) resolution
Resolution gets worse with increase of drift length diffusion effect magnitude depends on gas species P10 Ar+C2H6(30%) CF4 Electric field (V/cm) Drift velocity (cm/ms) Diffusion (mm) Ar(90%)+CH4(10%) 130 5.5 570 360 Ar(70%)+C2H6(30%) 390 5.0 320 190 CF4 8.9 110 80 R : P10 chevron B : P10 rect. Y : Ar+C2H6 rect. G : CF4 chevron

28 dE/dx Measurement Energy loss measurement (d=85mm)
P10: s(55Fe;5.9 keV) = 11 % Ne(primary) ~ 222 for 5.9keV Xray in P10  ~1.7 times larger than statistical estimate… obtained energy loss is as expected for various particles with different momentum Need to see for CF4

29 Beam Rate dependence Beam rate dependence of gain, resolution
Tested for P10 (d=85mm, Ed=0.1kV/cm) no change up to 5000 cps/cm2 50kHz Pb+Pb & <dN/dh>=1600  1200 cps/cm2 at r=100cm good enough for HI applications

30 Two Track Separation Tested with P10 Gas (d=85mm, Ed=0.1kV/cm)
Pulse shape analysis/MC simulation Two Track Separation in drift direction = 10mm for P10 Much larger than diffusion ~ 1mm AD8058 (used in preamp) is not adequate for pileup due to large leakage current (S/N). Faster clock is also needed. 10nsec/sample Dt=10 samples 100nec separation DZ = 100nsec* 5cm/usec ~ 5mm

31 Issues for GEM-TPC GEM-TPC is a promising candidate under the high rate and fast operations. Issues to be investigated: Ion feedback suppression How much we will need for the continuous readout? Reduce drift field only (vs. diffusion)? Some more GEM layers (small Et field between GEMs or including gating GEMs)?　Use thick GEM? Gas mixture Ne-CF4? Ne-CF4-X (X=N2, isoC4H8) Diffusion and PRF with existing pad size are reasonable? Attachment and worse energy resolution with CF4 are acceptable? Stability of GEMs against P/T, time, rate..

32 Go to Next Step We are very interested in GEM-TPC upgrade.
There are lots of activities in Japan for the GEM-based detectors. Well organized by MPGD working group in Japan KEK(for beam monitor, neutron, J-PARC exp), CNS-Tokyo(for ALICE), Saga Univ.(for ILC), Kobe Univ. (RD51 and for ATLAS), Kyoto-Univ. (for DM search, medical application)… We would like to join in some efforts by using our prototype GEM-TPC and testbench. (ex) basic properties under Ne-CF4 gas mixture (ex) build another prototype of IROC with 100um-GEM Discussion on how to collaborate would be appreciated. Beamtest in 2012 (before prototype installation in cavern?) (We will have FoCAL beamtest in CERN in Sept.)

33 Backup slides

34 Dependence of Ia and Ic onVGEM
Ed =0.33(kV/cm) Gain is ~700 (Triple) at VGEM =320V 結果です。 まず測定した電流値、パッド電流Iaとメッシュ電流IcのVGEM依存性の結果を示します。 GEMの枚数が1枚のときも 2枚のときも 3枚のときも、 VGEMが増加するとともに電流値は指数関数的に増えることが確かめられました。 　Both Ia and Ic increase exponentially with VGEM

35 Pad Response Function PRF Ar/CH4 Ar/C2H6 CF4

36 Pad Response Function PRF vs. drift length (Ar/C2H6) D=20 D=85 D=150
D=290mm

37 Simulation by Maxwell-3D
Electric field strength at the hole center Electric field strength near the edge (10um)

38 Simulation by Maxwell-3D
Example of Avalanche for CNS-GEM Ed ~ 1.5kV/cm Ei ~ 1.5kV/cm

39 Gas characteristics Drift velocity Longitudinal diffusion

40 CF4 quench Drift velocity Longitudinal diffusion

41 Experimental Configurations
Voltage configuration 3 GEM configurations HV1 HV2 Ed=（HV1-HV2）/0.3 　　　　　　　　 [kV/cm] VGEM 　　=HV2/6[V] R Eｔ Ei 3mm 2mm Triple Double Single パラメタのVGEMやEdを設定するのに、直接設定しているのは 左の囲いの中のHV1（ハイボルいち）とHV2（ハイボルに）です。 　　HV1はメッシュに、HV2はチェーン抵抗にそれぞれ独立にかかっています。 HV2はこのチェーン抵抗によって抵抗分割されているので、HV2を設定すると、 GEM両面の電極間につくる電位差VGEMやトランスファー領域の電場Ed、そしてインダクション領域の電場Eiが決まります。 今回の測定ではチェーン抵抗の各抵抗の値は同じなので、VGEM変化に伴ってトランスファー領域の電場Etと インダクション領域の電場Eiもスケールして変化しています。 右の囲いにはGEMの枚数を変えたときのセットアップをそれぞれ示しました。減らしたGEMの厚み分、パッドを上げて セットしました。 Et and Ei changes together with VGEM. Measure F as functions ofVGEM, Ed, and Et/Ei