英語勉強会 住谷⇨若松 2015/10/29 2限

原文 In the case of joint ownership with another person, a difference occurs to be based on the standard of own because the sensitivity is an implicit thing. Two causes are thought about. It is that a concrete object being uncertain and explanation to become the reason are uncertain. Adjusting the sense of value is important for mutual understanding, therefore is essential that verbalize the concrete object and reason. We suggest the two systems for this verbalization support. First, we called the standard generation system what to learn the method to pay off a standard. In the implementation of this system, I devised the visualization of the rearranging result. And I revised the list of data management, espoused the simple visualization to join each together with a link because the standard element becoming an object and the reason has many-to-many relationship. Second, it is the standard joint ownership system which can share the axis that I arranged with another person. I thought about the candidate of the necessary means and function for concrete system image for the implementation. As for the future problem, the limit function of verbalization and the preservation function of standard data are implementation for the standard generation system and contriving concrete the standard joint ownership system image.

1 In the case of… It is that a concrete… Adjusting the sense of … joint ownership 共有権？ a difference occurs..... 何の差異？？ thingいらないかな。。 It is that a concrete… objectは不明確？ 対象と感性の理由が曖昧だ から？？ Adjusting the sense of … sense of value 価値の感覚？→価値観？？ thereforeは主語にはならん In the case of joint ownership with another person, a difference occurs to be based on the standard of own because the sensitivity is an implicit thing.　 Two causes are thought about.　 It is that a concrete object being uncertain and explanation to become the reason are uncertain.　 Adjusting the sense of value is important for mutual understanding, therefore is essential that verbalize the concrete object and reason.　　 We suggest the two systems for this verbalization support.

1 変えてみた・・ Sharing mutual sensitivity is important for understanding of each other, however it is too difficult because of the implicitness. Our purpose is supporting to share mutual sensitivity. Verbalizing the concrete reason of the sensitivity improves to understand this sensitiveness. Therefore, We suggest two systems for this verbalization support. In the case of joint ownership with another person, a difference occurs to be based on the standard of own because the sensitivity is an implicit thing.　 Two causes are thought about.　 It is that a concrete object being uncertain and explanation to become the reason are uncertain.　 Adjusting the sense of value is important for mutual understanding, therefore is essential that verbalize the concrete object and reason.　　 We suggest the two systems for this verbalization support. 互いの感性を共有は他との理解することが重要だが暗黙的なのでとても難しい。 目的は互いの感性の共有をサポートすることだ。 感性の具体的な理由を言語化することは、感性を理解することを促進する

2 First, we called... In the implementation… And I revised.... 私たちは呼んだ？？ to learnとはこない気が。。 pay off a standard 基準を清算、買収？ In the implementation… I じゃないでしょ rearranging result 結果を再整理？ And I revised.... Andは文頭にはこない espouseは微妙な気がする each togetherという言い方 はない First, we called the standard generation system what to learn the method to pay off a standard. In the implementation of this system, I devised the visualization of the rearranging result. And I revised the list of data management, espoused the simple visualization to join each together with a link because the standard element becoming an object and the reason has many- to-many relationship.

2 変えてみた・・ First system is the standard generation system. In this system, leaner generates his clearly standard of classifying and modifying his sensitivity. The following is the use of this system. First, we called the standard generation system what to learn the method to pay off a standard. In the implementation of this system, I devised the visualization of the rearranging result. And I revised the list of data management, espoused the simple visualization to join each together with a link because the standard element becoming an object and the reason has many- to-many relationship. １つ目は基準生成システムです。 このシステムでは学習者は明確な基準の分類と感性を修正をする。

3,4 Second, it is the… I thought about … As for the future… Firstのとこはcallを使用 I？システムではなくて？ whichとかthatが多い I thought about … think aboutは思いつく感 がつよい。じっくり考え た時は使わない As for the future… As for ~ : ~に関して 言語化の制限機能って？ Problemじゃなくてtask じゃないん？ standard data are implementation ？？ Second, it is the standard joint ownership system which can share the axis that I arranged with another person. I thought about the candidate of the necessary means and function for concrete system image for the implementation. As for the future problem, the limit function of verbalization and the preservation function of standard data are implementation for the standard generation system and contriving concrete the standard joint ownership system image.

3,4 Second system is the standard sharing system. 直してみた・・ Second system is the standard sharing system. Currently, this system is not constructed. To consider and to implement the function of this system is the future work. Second, it is the standard joint ownership system which can share the axis that I arranged with another person. I thought about the candidate of the necessary means and function for concrete system image for the implementation. As for the future problem, the limit function of verbalization and the preservation function of standard data are implementation for the standard generation system and contriving concrete the standard joint ownership system image. ２つ目に基準共有システムです。 現在、このシステムは構築できていない。 このシステムの機能の実装と考察は今後の課題です。

ワンポイントその１ 第1文型 第2文型 S(主語) ＋ V(動詞) ＋ M(修飾語) (例)He gets up early. 第2文型 S(主語) ＋ V(動詞) ＋ C(補語) + M(修飾語) S = Cの関係。Cは名詞や形容詞 (例)He is a teacher.　He = teacher 第2文型を作る動詞 become, look, feel, sound, taste, get+形容詞, 1．become「～になる」 She became a singer.「彼女は、歌手になった。」 2．look「～のように見える」 She looks sad.「彼女は、悲しそうに見える。」 lookだけだと「～を見る」という意味ではなく、 「～のように見える」という意味になります。 ちなみに、「～を見る」はlook at ～ です。 3．feel「～に[と]感じる」 She felt happy.「彼女は、幸せに感じた。」 4．sound「～（のよう）に聞こえる」 The song sounds good.「その歌は、よさそうに聞こえる。」 5．taste 「～の味がする」 This curry tastes good.「このカレーは、美味しい。」 また、この文は直訳すると 「このカレーは、美味しい味がする」となりますが、 日本語的に不自然なので「このカレーは、美味しい。」とします。 6．get + 形容詞「～になる」 She got happy.「彼女は、幸せになった。」 She=happy「彼女=幸せ」の関係が成り立っています。

ワンポイントその２ 第3文型 S(主語) + V(動詞) + O(目的語) + M(修飾語) 全動詞の80%が目的語を後ろにとる (例)He played tennis yesterday 全動詞の80%が目的語を後ろにとる 動詞の後ろに「何(誰)を」や「誰に」があれば第3文 型

ワンポイントその３ 第4文型 S(主語) + V(動詞) + O1(目的語) + O2(目的語) (例)I gave her a present 動作の目的を表し、「何を」「誰に」にあたる 動詞の後ろに「何(誰)を」や「誰に」があれば第3文 型 第4文型を作る動詞 tell , show, lend, send, teach, buy, get, make, cook, find 1．tell O1 O2「O1にO2を言う（伝える）」 2．show O1 O2「O1にO2を見せる（教える）」 3．lend O1 O2「O1にO2を貸す」 4．send O1 O2「O1にO2を送る」 5．teach O1 O2「O1にO2を教える」 6．buy O1 O2「O1（のため）にO2を買う」 7．get O1 O2「O1（のため）にO2を手に入れる」 8．make O1 O2「O1（のため）にO2を作る」 9．cook O1 O2「O1（のため）にO2を料理する」 10．find O1 O2「O1（のため）にO2を見つける」

ワンポイントその4 第5文型 S(主語) + V(動詞) + O(目的語) + C(補語) 目的語を説明している補語がくる(目的格補語) (例)I call him Bob. 目的語を説明している補語がくる(目的格補語) C = O となる 第5文型を作る動詞 name, make, keep, think, find, elect